cat_logo
HomeOpel

Adam

Opel Adam Curb Weight in Easy-to-Read Graphs


Choose Generation

Average weight of Opel Adam

2013 Adam

Quick notes on Opel Adam weight

    • Average weight for generation: 1063 kg (2344 lbs)
    • Difference from world average: 420 kg or 926 lbs lighter
    • Difference from world's heaviest: 3397 kg or 7491 lbs lighter
    • Load to one wheel: 266 kg (586 lbs)
    • Maximum allowable weight: 1363 kg (3005 lbs)
    • Weight to torque ratio: 7 kg per 1 Nm
    • Weight to length ratio: 3.5 mm per 1 kg
    • Engine capacity to weight: 1.2 cc per 1 kg
    • Pounds per 1 kW: 30 lbs/kW
    • Weightly rating: 6 / 10

2012 Opel Adam curb weight

  • 1.4 ECOFLEX —1065 kg (2348 lbs)
  • 1.4 —1065 kg (2348 lbs)
  • S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX —1103 kg (2432 lbs)
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX —1103 kg (2432 lbs)
  • 1.0 ECOTEC —1081 kg (2384 lbs)
  • Rocks 1.0 ECOTEC —1081 kg (2384 lbs)
  • Rocks 1.4 —1060 kg (2337 lbs)
  • Rocks 1.4 ECOFLEX —1065 kg (2348 lbs)
  • Rocks 1.2 —1026 kg (2262 lbs)
  • Rocks 1.2 ECOFLEX —1011 kg (2229 lbs)
  • 1.2 —1011 kg (2229 lbs)
  • S 1.4 Turbo —1103 kg (2432 lbs)
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo —1103 kg (2432 lbs)
  • 1.2 ECOFLEX —1011 kg (2229 lbs)

    2012 Opel Adam weight to consumption ratio

  • 1.4 ECOFLEX —23 kg/mpg (51 lbs/mpg)
  • 1.4 —25 kg/mpg (55 lbs/mpg)
  • S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX —28 kg/mpg (62 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX —28 kg/mpg (62 lbs/mpg)
  • 1.0 ECOTEC —24 kg/mpg (53 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks 1.0 ECOTEC —24 kg/mpg (53 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks 1.4 —25 kg/mpg (55 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks 1.4 ECOFLEX —23 kg/mpg (51 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks 1.2 —24 kg/mpg (53 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks 1.2 ECOFLEX —22 kg/mpg (49 lbs/mpg)
  • 1.2 —23 kg/mpg (51 lbs/mpg)
  • S 1.4 Turbo —30 kg/mpg (66 lbs/mpg)
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo —30 kg/mpg (66 lbs/mpg)
  • 1.2 ECOFLEX —22 kg/mpg (49 lbs/mpg)

    2012 Opel Adam weight to consumption ratio

  • 1.4 ECOFLEX is 28.2% lighter than average
  • 1.4 is 28.2% lighter than average
  • S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX is 25.6% lighter than average
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX is 25.6% lighter than average
  • 1.0 ECOTEC is 27.1% lighter than average
  • Rocks 1.0 ECOTEC is 27.1% lighter than average
  • Rocks 1.4 is 28.5% lighter than average
  • Rocks 1.4 ECOFLEX is 28.2% lighter than average
  • Rocks 1.2 is 30.8% lighter than average
  • Rocks 1.2 ECOFLEX is 31.8% lighter than average
  • 1.2 is 31.8% lighter than average
  • S 1.4 Turbo is 25.6% lighter than average
  • Rocks S 1.4 Turbo is 25.6% lighter than average
  • 1.2 ECOFLEX is 31.8% lighter than average

    • Vehicle Curb weight Difference from world's smallest Weight to power ratio 0—60 mph acceleration ratio Consumption ratio
    1.4 ECOFLEX 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs     		640 kg (1411 lbs) heavier 11 kg to 1 hp 98 kg/s (216 lbs/s) 209 kg/L
    (461 lbs/L)
    1.4 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs     		640 kg (1411 lbs) heavier 12 kg to 1 hp 89 kg/s (196 lbs/s) 194 kg/L
    (428 lbs/L)
    S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs     		678 kg (1495 lbs) heavier 7 kg to 1 hp 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s) 187 kg/L
    (412 lbs/L)
    Rocks S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs     		678 kg (1495 lbs) heavier 7 kg to 1 hp 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s) 187 kg/L
    (412 lbs/L)
    1.0 ECOTEC 1081 kg /
    2384 lbs     		656 kg (1447 lbs) heavier 9 kg to 1 hp 115 kg/s (254 lbs/s) 212 kg/L
    (467 lbs/L)
    Rocks 1.0 ECOTEC 1081 kg /
    2384 lbs     		656 kg (1447 lbs) heavier 9 kg to 1 hp 115 kg/s (254 lbs/s) 212 kg/L
    (467 lbs/L)
    Rocks 1.4 1060 kg /
    2337 lbs     		635 kg (1400 lbs) heavier 11 kg to 1 hp 97 kg/s (214 lbs/s) 189 kg/L
    (417 lbs/L)
    Rocks 1.4 ECOFLEX 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs     		640 kg (1411 lbs) heavier 12 kg to 1 hp 89 kg/s (196 lbs/s) 209 kg/L
    (461 lbs/L)
    Rocks 1.2 1026 kg /
    2262 lbs     		601 kg (1325 lbs) heavier 15 kg to 1 hp 72 kg/s (159 lbs/s) 183 kg/L
    (404 lbs/L)
    Rocks 1.2 ECOFLEX 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs     		586 kg (1292 lbs) heavier 14 kg to 1 hp 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s) 202 kg/L
    (445 lbs/L)
    1.2 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs     		586 kg (1292 lbs) heavier 14 kg to 1 hp 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s) 191 kg/L
    (421 lbs/L)
    S 1.4 Turbo 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs     		678 kg (1495 lbs) heavier 7 kg to 1 hp 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s) 175 kg/L
    (386 lbs/L)
    Rocks S 1.4 Turbo 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs     		678 kg (1495 lbs) heavier 7 kg to 1 hp 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s) 175 kg/L
    (386 lbs/L)
    1.2 ECOFLEX 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs     		586 kg (1292 lbs) heavier 14 kg to 1 hp 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s) 202 kg/L
    (445 lbs/L)
    Vehicle 1.4 ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 640 kg (640 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 11 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 98 kg/s (216 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 209 kg/L
    (461 lbs/L)
    Vehicle 1.4
    Curb weight 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 640 kg (640 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 12 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 89 kg/s (196 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 194 kg/L
    (428 lbs/L)
    Vehicle S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 678 kg (678 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 7 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 187 kg/L
    (412 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks S 1.4 Turbo ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 678 kg (678 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 7 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 187 kg/L
    (412 lbs/L)
    Vehicle 1.0 ECOTEC
    Curb weight 1081 kg /
    2384 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 656 kg (656 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 9 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 115 kg/s (254 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 212 kg/L
    (467 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks 1.0 ECOTEC
    Curb weight 1081 kg /
    2384 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 656 kg (656 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 9 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 115 kg/s (254 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 212 kg/L
    (467 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks 1.4
    Curb weight 1060 kg /
    2337 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 635 kg (635 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 11 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 97 kg/s (214 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 189 kg/L
    (417 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks 1.4 ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1065 kg /
    2348 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 640 kg (640 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 12 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 89 kg/s (196 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 209 kg/L
    (461 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks 1.2
    Curb weight 1026 kg /
    2262 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 601 kg (601 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 15 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 72 kg/s (159 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 183 kg/L
    (404 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks 1.2 ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 586 kg (586 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 14 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 202 kg/L
    (445 lbs/L)
    Vehicle 1.2
    Curb weight 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 586 kg (586 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 14 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 191 kg/L
    (421 lbs/L)
    Vehicle S 1.4 Turbo
    Curb weight 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 678 kg (678 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 7 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 175 kg/L
    (386 lbs/L)
    Vehicle Rocks S 1.4 Turbo
    Curb weight 1103 kg /
    2432 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 678 kg (678 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 7 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 136 kg/s (300 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 175 kg/L
    (386 lbs/L)
    Vehicle 1.2 ECOFLEX
    Curb weight 1011 kg /
    2229 lbs
    Difference from world's smallest 586 kg (586 lbs) heavier
    Weight to power ratio 14 kg to 1 hp
    0—60 mph acceleration ratio 71 kg/s (157 lbs/s)
    Consumption ratio 202 kg/L
    (445 lbs/L)